Rings

Audience Reviews

View More

Wallef S @Wsil10 Jul 5 O padre voltando a enxergar foi de matar o filme!!! See more The W @TheWagners Jul 4 I can't really talk about anything in this movie because it's non-existent. There's really no plot and people play with the ring tape now like it's a bad trend or something? What the hell. Just watch the first The ring and you won't be disappointed, skip this atrocity at all costs. PS ending is supposed to be a twist "Samara will be reborn through some random girl" hooray for nonsense. See more Rosie T. @RT44484436 May 30 If anyone deserves to die, it’s the female lead in this movie See more Jaime M @RT45376361 May 16 This movie was trash and boring never again watching it See more Carlos M @CarlosMZ Apr 7 No es tan buena como la 2 pero sinceramente no es mala la trama es buena lo que supongo que no le gusto a varios es el hecho que la prota es medio acosadora al inicio pero tenia buenas intenciones y eso es lo que cuenta. See more James M @Jim4film Mar 28 Rings is underrated. Sure, it is a little formulaic, with the usual sprinkling of overly dark spaces, flashing strobe lights and cliche jump scares, but it achieves what so many other sequels fail to achieve: it extends the underlying storyline. The central idea that the cursed VHS tape gets transferred onto digital media is a clever one, and brings to movie into the modern era. The casting is solid, as is the acting and direction. Johnny Galecki's performance is great. Vincent D'Onofrio, one of the most underrated actors of modern times, is terrific as the priest Galen Burke. Matilda Lutz does a solid job in her role as Julia, but does not stand out from the ensemble. The script needed improving, feeling slow-moving and unoriginal at times. See more Read all reviews

Rings

My Rating

Read More Read Less WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW POST RATING